Letter Re Advice on Valmet .308 Rifles and Magazines

Dear Jim:
I need your advice. Years ago, when it appeared likely that some type of an ‘assault weapon’ ban would be enacted, I began to look for a semi-automatic rifle which would be suitable for hunting, but which would also possess the absolute reliability and durability of a military weapon. I wanted something which wouldn’t look too ‘threatening’ to people who were not comfortable around military-style firearms, and something a bit more powerful, with greater penetrating ability and longer range than typical .223 based weapons.

I settled on a little-known rifle, the .308 Hunter made by Valmet Company of Finland. It boasted one of the best AK mechanisms ever made, fired the most satisfactory 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester cartridge, and cleverly concealed it’s ‘mean looking’ gas tube and mechanism under conventional-looking wooden stocks.

My Valmet Hunter came with three magazines, one each of: 5, 9 and 20 rounds capacity. I did not attempt to add any extra magazines at that time. Sadly, our family’s home back then, was located in the populous Baltimore-Washington corridor, and opportunities to ‘exercise’ my Valmet were infrequent.

Now I live in a small south-central Pennsylvania town, and my wife and I are working feverishly to improve our family preparedness situation. Regrettably, during the intervening years, a ‘friend’ managed to lose the 20-round magazine, Valmet went out of business (After 40 years?!!) , and magazines for the hunter have become unaffordable at best and unobtainable in general! In-spite of the fact that the Valmet is not the most accurate rifle for long range shooting, I have become quite fond of it, and I am reluctant to let it go, but a personal protection weapon with only two small magazines is not the most useful.

What would you advise? Our family has very limited means. Right now we have only two handguns, a shotgun, one small caliber and one larger caliber rifle (the Valmet) . Should we give-up on the Valmet, sell it, and buy something else? Or, keep vainly searching for magazines which I might be able to hammer, file and grind to fit what we’ve got? Sincerely, Steve W.

JWR Replies: If you can find magazines, then keep that Valmet! OBTW, you can tell your friend that he lost a magazine that is now worth between $250 and $300.

My wife a has a shortened Valmet .308 Hunter (called a “Petra” in Finland”) with a Trijicon 3-9x scope, and she loves it. When I offered to build an L1A1 for her in the same stock and barrel dimensions, for the sake of magazine compatibility with our primary rifles, she refused to part with it. Luckily we had bought 9 spare 20 round Valmet magazines back when they were still affordable.
I recommend that you buy at least of a dozen of the 12 and 25 round Galil .308 “waffle” magazines (much easier to find than Valmet mags!) and have them converted to fit Valmet M76/Hunter pattern, by a competent gunsmith.
One good place to find 25 round Galil .308 magazines is Buddy Hinton’s board. (You might try a “WTB” post there.) Some very inexpensive Galil 12 round .308 magazines–originally made for blank firing, but the the blocking plate is quick and easy to remove–are available from WhatACountry.com. OBTW, when you call, please tell Yasha that Jim Rawles sent you. You might also try Ohio Rapidfire (ORF) as a source for 25 rounders. They have apparently tapped into all of the importers for magazines from Israel since ORF has started building Galils in the US with surplus parts sets and American-made receivers.





Jim’s Quote of the Day:

"At this point the debate is not about a soft landing or hard landing; it is about how hard the hard landing will be." – Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at New York University



Note from JWR:

The high bid in the current SurvivalBlog Benefit Auction is now at $340. The auction is for a scarce original 1980s-vintage Heckler und Koch 19mm Emergency Flare Launcher (EFL) aka “Notsignalgerät from my personal collection. It comes with three magazines and 28 scarce original German 19mm flares–10 red, 10 white, and 8 green. Together, this package is worth approximately $400. It is not classified as a “firearm” under Federal law. (Consult your state and local laws before bidding.) Sorry, no overseas bids will be accepted for this auction. This auction ends on January 15th. Please e-mail us your bids, in $10 increments.



Understanding Labor, Wealth, and Real Money

Our generation in the First World is presently living in a time of unprecedented wealth, luxury, and leisure. Technology has allowed huge advances in transportation, health care, and commerce. But much of the “wealth” that has been created is transitory.

Real Wealth

In essence, the only real wealth in the world is extractive. Extractive wealth come from mining, oil drilling, timber cutting, farming, ranching, or fishing. Manufacturing, while important, is essentially re-arranging what was originally extracted. And all other “wealth creation” in the so-called service economy is even more abstract–it is merely shuffling around bits of paper or electronic digits that represent someone else’s original extractive labor, or manufacturing labor.

Our society has put unrealistic values on services. What would you rather own? One share of Google stock (currently worth around $650), or 10 shares of Caterpillar, Inc. (“Cat”) stock–also currently worth around $650.) Google does not produce any tangible products. They only provide a service. Their capital assets are a just office buildings, computers, desks, and chairs. In contrast, Cat has huge factories with almost 100,000 employees that produce many thousands of machines each year that can be used to extract real wealth through mining, farming, and forestry. But oddly, the market capitalization of Google is larger than that of Cat. What is wrong with this picture?

Now consider this: What would you rather own? 12 shares of Caterpillar Tractor stock (currently worth around $850), or an ounce of gold (also currently worth around $850)? The Caterpillar corporation could go bankrupt, making your shares of Cat stock worthless. (Just ask anyone that owned Pan-Am stock. Those stock certificates are now useful only as bird cage liner.) Can the value of an ounce of gold ever reach zero? Certainly not.



Letter Re: Prepared Individuals and the OODA Loop

Jim-
You are probably familiar with Bill Whittle’s web site. Whittle’s writings are always arresting. His latest essay has relevance for all of us SurvivalBlog readers who are going through OODA loops [“Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act”] unwittingly and therefore inefficiently. His essay observes that although OOD is far more important than Action, success after all depends on Action–done with speed. So this subject is timely for those of us watching events unfolding. Many are pretty good at Observing and Orienting. Fewer are Deciding (which is a concrete term–not ephemeral “planning”).
Your site is very good at presenting the issues with an underlying OODA concept. It’s up to readers to understand it and to Act!
Maybe Whittle’s essay will help. – Bob B.



Letter Re: Preparedness Implications of the Global Food Shortages

Jim,
I thought you might find this interesting as I recall a posting about this some time back. Here is a link to an interesting article about a foreseen food shortage that is described as not if but when it happens.

I would like to point out the implication of this towards those who are interested in survival in that it would directly impact those trying to establish long term food storage using raw ingredients such as wheat and corn as they are highlighted in this article. The United States has more than enough ability to feed our nation and pretty much all nations around the world with our domestic food growth capabilities, however, the irony is that we have over a period of time reduced that output and depend more on imports. Yet another reason why government involvement makes absolutely no sense at any level with decisions made 30, 40, and 50 years ago impacting us today in such negative ways.

I have personally felt it would be more constructive to grow and store your own food while you can still readily by food for your day to day needs. This would serve a couple purposes; the practical experience of growing crops in volume, and of course the cost saving of producing your own long term food stores minus the Mylar bags and storage containers. Your brother in Liberty, – Dave in Florida



Letter Re: North Dakota as a Retreat Locale

Jim,
I couldn’t help but enjoy and giggle at the article that painted North Dakota so empty, old, and bleak. I am proud to be a North Dakotan, and find living here a blessing. “Brutal climate”, well it is the debt we North Dakotans pay to live in a beautiful land, with solid people, and raise our children in a nurturing environment. Young, strong, very well educated youth are our best export . Of course grain, oil, and livestock are good too. And, I regularly see youth returning back to good ole North Dakota for the quality of life once they figure out the grass really is greener here; I did! I’m betting most of your blog readers are strong enough to handle a North Dakota winter – it’s a character builder! “Nuclear weapons”, well, every place has its down side. There are many places well west of the [nuclear missile] silos, and with our solid westerly winds, I don’t worry too much. Finally, “lack of jobs” … this is a bit misleading, to say the least. We are desperate for reliable, solid people who are not afraid to get their hands dirty. Especially in Western North Dakota, the oil industry is especially desperate for good workers and starting them out at mid-$20s per hour. A person can make that go a long way in an area that has land prices starting at $500 to $1,000 per acre. Something to consider for people looking for a little freedom. Here, one does not need to buy a whole town for concealed carry. Is that really how bad it is in other parts of the country? Spike in ND

JWR Replies: Thanks for your comments. I rank North Dakota 8th out of my list of 19 western states, for retreat potential. I would probably rank it higher if it weren’t for its harsh climate. You can of course make up for a lot of that by building a large greenhouse and by keeping extra home heating fuel on hand. I advise keeping a three year supply, whether you heat with coal, firewood, propane, or home heating oil.

All of North Dakota is potentially down wind of nuclear targets in Montana, most notably Malmstrom AFB and extensive surrounding missile fields. I recommend that every family in North America have a fallout shelter, since in this age of terrorism you never know when and where the next nuke will be detonated. (And terrorist nukes will almost assuredly be ground bursts that will kick up plenty of fallout.)



Odds ‘n Sods:

Due to the recent huge storm in Northern California the Freeze Dry Guy‘s phone lines are down. (But they can still handle orders via e-mail.) Yesterday, Professor Jim McCanney likened the recent storm to a hurricane.

   o o o

RBS kindly sent us this (and the two subsequent): Russia raises grain export duties to 40%. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the US make a similar move, to stem the flood of grain out of the US, primarily to Asia.

   o o o

News from Australia: Mozzies in plague proportions

   o o o

China could be winner in Alaska oil war

Jim’s Quote of the Day:



Jim’s Quote of the Day:

"Punishment is now unfashionable… because it creates moral distinctions among men, which, to the democratic mind, are odious. We prefer a meaningless collective guilt to a meaningful individual responsibility." – Thomas Szasz



Note from JWR:

Today we present another article for Round 14 of the SurvivalBlog non-fiction writing contest. The writer of the best non-fiction article will win a valuable four day “gray” transferable Front Sight course certificate. (Worth up to $2,000!) Second prize is a copy of my “Rawles Gets You Ready” preparedness course, generously donated by Jake Stafford of Arbogast Publishing. Round 14 ends on January 31st, so e-mail us your entry soon! Remember that articles that relate practical “how to” skills for survival will have an advantage in the judging.



Elements of Quality Pistol Holster Design, by Steven

Does a good holster really make a difference? The answer is that sometimes it doesn’t. That may sound odd coming from a custom holster maker, but lets consider the average handgun owner. They keep their firearm on the top shelf in a shoe box in the closet, or in a nightstand drawer. On the way to the range, it might ride in a plastic case in the car trunk and back to the closet again. Should they need a container for their pistol that affords some protection and allows belt carry for short-periods of non-critical use, then factory produced budget models will fit the bill nicely. I’m glad to refer them to my local sporting goods store. The elements of quality holster design and construction are only noticed at the upper levels of performance.

The Situation Report.
Since I do a lot of concealed carry holsters, most of my clients are off-duty, plainclothes, undercover officers, and private citizens. But contrary to popular belief, it is the latter group which will benefit most from a quality concealed carry holster. Private citizens with Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) permits have lost those permits by allowing their weapon to become visible (called “flashing”) or show through their clothes (called “printing”). A panic “man with a gun” 911 call then summons uniformed officers to the scene. Their officer survival training will make them assume everybody is a bad guy until they sort out the mess. Off-duty and plainclothes officers often wear their badges on the belt next to the holster. If their piece should inadvertently “flash”, the fearful person also sees the badge which settles them down. This tends to create a cavalier attitude among some officers toward concealment. Intentionally or unintentionally broadcasting the fact that you are armed can create a tactical disadvantage. Determined predators who know in advance that a shopkeeper, for instance, is armed tend to come in shooting. And it is the height of foolishness to draw on an already drawn gun.

General Holster Notes.
A quality designed and executed holster is part of a overall system that is used in emergency situations. A defensive pistol is an emergency rescue tool, like a fire extinguisher. The problem is having it handy when you need it. This may seem obvious, but the first rule of gun fighting is have a gun. Having a pistol that is ready without restricting activities of daily living is exactly the mission of the well-designed holster. The holster is a means of always having it when you need it, on your person. For this reason I do not suggest using a bag or purse holster for your primary pistol if it can be avoided. A purse or bag is difficult to draw from, and is often the target of the assailant in the first place. If you expect trouble grab your shotgun or rifle. Holsters should be precisely fitted to the pistol they will carry and should be used only for that pistol, or a pistol with identical dimensions. The selling of holsters marked “Large Auto” or “Medium Revolver” is a common practice but totally ill-advised when serious use is intended. Factory produced holsters can and do make compromises in their design, the primary one of which is ease of production. Factory produced holsters are no better than the least skilled worker who builds it. Two types of makers design most holsters: Firearms enthusiasts with no leather experience, or secondly, experienced leather craftsman with no firearms and specifically, no concealed carry experience. The good designers have a combination of both like the late Bruce Nelson, Milt Sparks, Andy Arratoonian, and Thad Rybka, etc. Some of the best designs have been collaborations of these two knowledge bases. In addition, when a holster style or design is successfully created, the manufacturer then attempts to make similar patterns for other types of handguns with subtle differences in weight, balance, and handling characteristics. This compromises the original for the sake of simplicity of production. Some manufacturers contract out the R & D aspects of holster design because they have lost the ability to innovate in house, whereas the custom leather craftsman seeks to address a specific design problem with every project. I have never made two holsters exactly alike. The rule, “form follows function” applies here. The second restriction on quality is that the best materials are expensive and in most instances hard to obtain in quantity. When the dense, tough leather is found that makes the best holsters, the supply may not remain constant in its quality. A parallel example exists with bench rest shooters who demand premium reloading components so that they can make their own highly accurate ammunition.

Combat Grip.
The most important aspect of achieving a consistent firing grip is the burying of the web between the thumb and forefinger into the upper blackstrap of the pistol. This is particularly true of recoil operated semi-automatic pistols, some of which have grip safeties that must be depressed by this proper grip. Many holster designs require the changing of ones grip prior to achieving a firing stance. Any holster that, by its inherent design, prevents a full and final grip upon first contact with the pistol while still in the holster is fatally flawed from the outset.

Front Sight, Press. Proper aiming requires focusing on the front sight and allowing the target to blur somewhat. The holster needs to be designed so that the front sight blade does not shave slivers of leather off the inside of the holster. This can be very distracting.

Belt holsters are by far the more popular holsters for people who carry a handgun concealed for serious social encounters. Belt holsters come in two general types: those worn inside the pants, and those worn outside-the-pants. Inside-the-pants rigs are commonly called inside-the-waistband (IWB) holsters. Generally IWB holsters conceal pistols better than outside-the-pants holsters since the pistol is only visible above the belt line. There is a downside to this level of concealment, however.

Comfort.
Even the best IWB holsters won’t change the fact that you are carrying a big chunk of steel in your pants. Some people like IWB, some do not. Reinforcing the holster mouth for re-holstering is good for all holsters, but essential for IWB holsters.

Weight and balance are very different between revolvers and semi-automatic pistols. While revolvers center their weight in the cylinder, semi-autos will center their weight in the grip area. Particularly with semi-autos, so-called “high ride” holsters can be very top heavy. Positioning the trigger guard any higher than belt level, places up to 80% of the weight of the pistol from one to three inches above the belt. Example: With a “high ride” Colt Officers ACP pistol on a 1″ belt, one could grab the holster and pull out and down until the holstered gun was upside-down on the belt. Smaller torso women find high-ride pistols hitting them in the armpits on the draw, looking like a “chicken wing” motion. With revolvers I position the cylinder at belt level.

Belts should be wide enough to support the weight of the pistol. At least 1 1/2″, preferably 1 3/4″ for larger pistols. (Caution, wide gun belts scream “Cop” if they are not otherwise common in your area). Gun belts should be leather lined and about 1/4″ thick or otherwise reinforced torsionally. Fabric and braided leather belts should be avoided. Cutting the belt out on a curve creates a more comfortable belt, especially for women. The belt should fit tightly into the holster slot when new and will break in to a proper snug fit. Constantly adjusting a poorly fitted holster is the sign of a novice and a dead give away that you’re “packing iron.” This solid belt/holster connection assures that the pistol will be in the same place with every draw. In time, your firing stroke will be as natural as reaching for your wallet. Consistency leads to smoothness, which with practice leads to speed with accuracy.

Strong side holsters have been the preferred position for belt holsters. Traditionally these holsters were made with the barrel angled as much as 45 degrees back from vertical. This position is commonly called the “FBI rake” or “FBI cant”. When first introduced with medium frame revolver holsters with single fold-over belt loops, the design helped to conceal the larger butts of these pistols. In the early 1960’s with the advent of practical pistol competition, it became apparent that this angle was detrimental to achieving a good grip on the pistol. The hand as well as wrist should be in as close to firing stance as possible. Imagine a line running through the forearm, wrist, hand and parallel to the barrel of the pistol. In 1967, with the introduction of the #1 Professional for semi-auto pistol, Bruce Nelson was among the first to correct this problem by designing his holster with no rearward cant (vertical). A 10-degree angle is still good for revolvers due to their longer curved backstrap, however. He solved the problem of the butt printing by using a belt loop with a trailing slot to pull the butt in tight to the body, Askins style (i.e. Charles Askins). This allowed the proper firing angle to remain consistent throughout the firing stroke. The further one wears their holster rearward from the right hipbone toward the back, the more angle is required. For this reason, most Small-Of-the Back (S.O.B.) holsters are nearly horizontal. A word of caution on S.O.B. holsters, falling backward against a hard surface wearing a full-size handgun in a S.O.B. holster could lead to injury of the lower back. Use of S.O.B. rigs with only smaller frame pistols is advisable.

Cross draw Holsters are good for concealment purposes for two reasons. They provide easier access while sitting and simplify the clearing of the coat since you reach inside the coat rather than “sweeping the coat” out of the way as in a strong side draw. Cross draw holsters are better for women, who are actually faster with them than their male counterparts due to their narrower torsos, greater flexibility, and more limber arms . Some people however give cross draw holsters a bad rap as being easy to snatch away since the butt of the pistol faces forward. With the belt loop and trailing slot design, the gun butt is pulled tight to the body making it less obtrusive. Weapon retention is primarily a training issue and not a holster design issue. Attempts to make snatch proof duty holsters have made them difficult for officers to draw themselves. In addition, the use of a retaining strap can slow the draw and interfere with obtaining a proper grip on the pistol if not designed properly.

Shoulder holsters are also better for women for the reasons cited above, in addition they are good for pregnant women who can’t wear belts. The hardest part to conceal in a shoulder holster is not the holster but the harness; since most harnesses “print” through jackets. BTW, one way to discover (“make”) a person wearing a shoulder rig is to pat them on the back. One-handed blind re-holstering is almost impossible with shoulder holsters. As an experiment, try to simultaneously cuff someone while re-holstering your pistol in a shoulder rig. Not only is it a two-handed operation, but you will probably have to look to see what you are doing. On a personal note, as a certified firearms instructor, horizontal shoulder holsters (where the muzzle points backward), have always made me cautious. If you are new to concealed carry and must use a shoulder rig, use a vertical shoulder holster. I use an Andy Arratoonian SHR vertical, it’s the best. Sorry “Miami Vice” fans.

Ankle holsters are well suited for guns of back-up size such as medium to small semi-autos and shrouded hammer or “hammerless” J-frame revolvers. Why might someone who is not an officer, carry a second gun? The fastest reload is a second pistol. Also, imagine a situation where your client is confronted by multiple assailants (read: gang). He can now arm his fully trained and trusted associate who doesn’t have a firearm, thus greatly improving their odds of survival. For a right-handed (strong side) person the ankle holster should be positioned above the inside ankle of the left (weak side) leg. Ankle holsters work well when seated or pretending to tie your shoe, but are not particularly fast. One draws his primary pistol, reaches for his back-up gun, and struggles for his hideout piece (don’t let things degenerate to hide-out phase please). This is one mode of carry that would benefit from a pull-through type of retention strap. However, always hand bone the holster for proper fit first, then size the straps, never rely on the retention device for proper holster fit. This maxim applies to all holsters but especially ankle rigs. I do not generally use linings for holsters, but ankle rigs need to be padded and lined on the leg side of the holster. Thick wool fleece is often used, but an orthopedic (silicone tannage) suede over non-crushing foam seems best. Wool fleece will absorb moisture and get matted down. Also, if you are apt to break into impressions of Gene Kelly doing “Singin’ in the Rain”, an ankle holster may not be right for him.

Pocket Holsters work well with handguns of back up or the smaller hideout size. The practice of carrying a pistol loose in a pocket presents several problems. A pistol loose in your pocket looks like a pistol loose in your pocket. It will probably not be oriented butt up for a proper draw when you need it. Dirt and pocket debris can foul the action if not protected. In addition, the loose lining of some pockets can block hammer travel on revolvers causing a jam. These issues should be addressed in both weapon selection and holster design. Firing from inside and through the pocket should be possible, should things get “up close and personal”. Semi-autos have to eject the empty brass cases somewhere and they tend to jam the piece. Revolvers contain the fired brass cases within the cylinder until manually ejected and are better for in pocket firing of multiple rounds. Yes, you are going to ruin your jacket, better that ruining your whole day!

There are almost as many design elements of a quality holster, as there are people to wear them. Holsters can be a very individual and personal item. I’ve attempted to highlight what I feel are some of the more important design elements, and this article is by no means exhaustive. The following resources listed below are well worth the addition to the custom holster users library. РSteven at The Gunfitters

References and Some Suggested Reading:
Bruce Nelson, Combat Leather catalog, 1986
Trey Bloodworth and Mike Raley, Hidden in Plain Sight, 1995
Bill Jordan, No Second Place Winner, 1965
Massad F. Ayoob, In the Gravest Extreme, 1980
Massad F. Ayoob, Handgun Primer, 1986
Col. Rex Applegate, Kill or Get Killed, 2nd edition, 1951
Col. Jeff Cooper, To Ride, Shoot Straight, and Speak the Truth, 1988
Jesus Christ, Holy Bible, Luke 22:36, KJV, 1611



The Four Laws of Firearms Safety

For the benefit of those that are new to SurvivalBlog, it is important to again mention The Four Laws of Firearms Safety, developed by the late Col. Jeff Cooper

1) All firearms are loaded. – There are no exceptions. Don’t pretend that this is true. Know that it is and handle all firearms accordingly. Do not believe it when someone says: “It isn’t loaded.”

2) Never let the muzzle of a firearm point at anything you are not willing to destroy. – If you would not want to see a bullet hole in it do not allow a firearm’s muzzle to point at it.

3) Keep your finger off the trigger unless your sights are on the target. – Danger abounds if you keep your finger on the trigger when you are not about to shoot. Speed is not gained by prematurely placing your finger on the trigger as bringing a firearm to bear on a target takes more time than it takes to move your finger to the trigger.

4) Be sure of your target and what is behind it. – Never shoot at sounds or a target you cannot positively identify. Know what is in line with the target and what is behind it (bullets are designed to go through things). Be aware of your surroundings whether on a range, in the woods, or in a potentially lethal conflict.



Odds ‘n Sods:

I finally got the chance to go see the movie I Am Legend“. A friend who is not preparedness- minded went with me and he commented that he found the film terrifying only because it seemed plausible. He said that unlike “Resident Evil” which seemed like an unrealistic video game to him, “I Am Legend” was genuinely frightening. This leads me to believe that the film might encourage some erstwhile sheeple to get prepared. My friend did mention that if he was in Dr. Neville’s position he would have dynamited and bulldozed all of the buildings in a three block radius to clear fields of fire.

   o o o

Matt in Texas suggested this must-read piece economics article: Enter 2008: The System Breaks. Matt’s comment: “This article by Jim Willie is an 11 on a scale of 1-to-10 for the ‘Sphincter Quotient'”.

   o o o

Ready Made Resources has reduced the prices on the new photovoltaic (PV) power product in their line. For those of us that can’t afford a full-blown PV system, they sell the Brunton Solarport –a 4.4 watt compact folding PV panel designed to charge electronics like cell phones, digital cameras, GPS receivers, and PDAs via a USB port, as well as charging batteries for radios and flashlights, with and included charging tray. It come with a 20″ extendable power cable with a modular adapter plug. Up to three units can be linked together for more current output. See the Ready Made Resources web site for complete specifications. The price is now under $110 each!

   o o o

The Memsahib has been receiving seed catalogs in the mail ever since Christmas. Seems like those catalogs are arriving earlier and earlier every year.



Jim’s Quote of the Day:

“Every morning in Africa a gazelle awakens knowing it must today run faster than the fastest lion or it will be eaten. Every morning a lion awakens knowing it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve. It matters not whether you are a gazelle or a lion, when the sun rises you had better be running.” – African Proverb