(Continued from Part 3.)
Tasers and stun guns are another type of disruptive weapon, but regulations regarding possessing them tend to vary widely. Tasers are generally gun-like devices that shoot barbs on wires to deliver a high voltage to the target’s body, while stun guns require direct physical contact to deliver the voltage. I’m not crazy about any weapon that requires you to get close enough to an attacker to touch them, but it might be useful in some scenarios or as a last ditch option. A useful type of stun gun is the Stun Pen ($17), which doesn’t look like a traditional stun gun so it might mislead an attacker for several seconds. One potentially useful feature of stun guns is that if you push the button to activate them they make a very loud snapping/popping sound, which might deter a less-determined attacker. However, once you’ve done that you’ve given away the fact you’re carrying a stun gun, so a more determined attacker might just take action to disarm you.
Sound can also be used to disrupt an attack, but it’s generally only effective in limited circumstances, and it’s just as likely to impact you as it is an attacker unless you’re wearing hearing protection. Those small pull-pin personal alarms from companies like BASU, Resqume and others can put out 120db+ of sound, which is more than enough to temporarily disorient an attacker in a confined area and cause them to cover their ears. However, it won’t work as well in more open spaces, and even if you’re expecting it the sound can still cause you some discomfort.Continue reading“Alternative and Improvised Weapons – Part 4, by J.M.”