Three fine articles have gave been posted in SurvivalBlog lately on the subject of Get Home Bags. First, J.M. addressed the question of getting back home if stranded at a distance by using exact planning. Second, St. Funogas described a more general plan that focused on the basics of minimal equipment and keeping up calorie intake. Last, J. Smith advocated for good-quality clothing and equipment and aligning priorities with resources.
J.M. approached the problem as an ultralight (UL) or super-ultralight (SUL) hiker. The problem set was narrowly defined: maximum distance, various possible routes and start points, range of weather conditions, and possible equipment sets. A collection of very nice high-end equipment was put together and explained, which would get the person in question into good shape to make a self-rescue trip in a chaotic situation.
St. Funogas looked at the question much more generally, framing it as seeking the surest and simplest way to get back from a distance reached with two or three hours of driving. His solution was to focus on foot care, on keeping up a high calorie intake with minimum effort, and on very little support equipment.
J. Smith advised that travelers prepare with good clothing and packs and a solid plan for making use of water and wood resources along one’s way. He also advised matching one’s efforts and resources to the order of threats.
My background is not in backpacking or in world travel, but rather in 22 years of Army service. But the Army doesn’t have any activity that’s the equivalent of “getting home”. Escape & evasion is most like it, but it presupposes a hostile environment. Of course, if we’re starting with widespread chaos in our getting home situation, that might be hostile too.Continue reading“Another Get Home Bag Approach – Part 1, by G.P.”