Letter Re: Question on LEDs and EMP

Hi Jim:
Your blog is the best I’ve come across on the Internet. Very useful information. Regarding the subject of [Electromagnetic Pulse] EMP, are the new Light Emitting Diode (LED) flashlights more, or less immune to EMP than those using conventional incandescent bulbs?

Modern solid-state circuitry is in grave danger of terminal damage in the event of an EMP occurrence.
LEDs are composed of a semiconductor junction, similar to transistors and integrated circuits.
Do modern LED flashlights have enough of the right characteristics to pick up sufficient EMP burst energy and become permanently useless?

Your comments please, and thank you. – Clark F. in Canada

JWR Replies: LEDs are not absolutely impervious to nuclear weapons effects, but their design makes them fairly robust. Most of the publicized vulnerability of microcircuits to EMP pertains to Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) devices, which are indeed quite sensitive to fast rise-time high voltage spikes. (Everything from EMP, to lightning, to even just a the touch of a human finger transmitting static electricity.) In essence, the smaller MOS-based chip gate dimensions, the more vulnerable the chip is to EMP. But according to C.N. Ghiosh, writing in the IDSA’s Strategic Analysis Journal, “[microcircuit]…diodes, transistors, gate arrays and ICs are based on pure silicon slices [which do not have the same EMP vulnerability as MOS devices] as their electrical properties depend upon the regularity and uniformity of the basic silicon crystal lattices. The initial total damage from Neutron radiation is proportional to the neutron influence, but there is a subsequent annealing process during which there is some degree of recovery. This apart, the damage could be permanent. Also it may be made clear here that it makes no difference whether the device is working equipment or kept on the shelf for future use. However, the annealing process will be longer in such cases. According to Ghiosh, when struck by neutron radiation, “Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) can suffer degradation in optical output by 10 to 20 per cent.” In essence, LEDs are far less vulnerable to nuclear weapons effects. Hard gamma or neutron radiation would kill you long before you noticed any degradation of LEDs due to silicon matrix disruption! And EMP waveforms themselves don’t affect the silicon structure on an LED. The scale of a LED semiconductor junction is huge compared to the junctions found in gate array chips. So even if they were MOS-based, LEDs would be an order of magnitude less vulnerable to EMP. The bottom line is that I wouldn’t worry about EMP destroying LEDs.



Letter Re: Keeping Firearms Functioning in Extreme Cold Temperatures

Hi Jim,
I’m in the middle of reading Roy E. Appleman’s book “East of Chosin. It is an account of the tragic fate of the 31st Regimental Combat team during the Korean conflict.

Several references talk about the soldiers weapons (especially M1 Carbines) locking up due to the extreme (-20 Fahrenheit or greater) cold. It mentioned how the Chinese weapons worked because they had little or no oil in them. I imagined those weapons had a short operational life without lubrication, but they worked when needed.

What would you recommend to keep firearms functional in extreme cold? A dry/powdered lubricant? Sincerely, – Ron S. in Upstate New York

JWR Replies: Thanks for mentioning this topic! It is particularly important fro SurvivalBlog readers, since firearms will surely be carried and used outdoors more frequently, post-TEOTWAWKI. The only sure method to keep firearms actions from binding in sub-zero weather is to completely de-lubricate the moving parts, using a spray can of carburetor cleaner solvent such as Gummout or Berryman’s B12 Chem Tool. (Wear rubber gloves!) and then re-lubricate, using a dry film lubricant such as Dri-Slide or similar molybdenum disulfide powder. Even when using these dry lubes, there is the chance that moisture from rain or condensation can get in a gun’s action and freeze it to the point of binding. Therefore, it is important to frequently test your guns’ actions by cycling them, whenever the temperature drops below freezing



Letter Re: Expedient Footware

Jim,
I was doing my nightly research on the web and discovered a great resource for making Expedient Footware. This seemed a slick and quick answer. Check out this link for the directions on fabricating sandals out of tires. I printed a copy of the instructions and they will become part of my library for that rainy day event we all hope never happens. The children and I will make our practice run set here shortly. – Matt B.



Odds ‘n Sods:

From reader RBS: Dash for green fuel pushes up price of meat in US

   o o o

Larry LaBorde, was quoted at 321Gold.com, on April 13th: “The United States dollar index has dropped below 82 today. We would do well to remember that the index is just a measure of the USD strength in relation to other currencies. It is sort of like measuring the USD with a rubber yardstick. While all currencies are racing to zero the USD just got a little ahead of the others. Check out www.coinflation.com and scroll down until you get to the current melt value of US coins. Notice a nickel is now worth over 9 cents. It seems that the USD has devalued faster than the US mint can cheapen its coins. A safe investment today is to simply trade federal reserve notes for nickels at your local bank and make an immediate profit of 80%. While some people may remind you that it is illegal to melt US coinage, just remember the pre-1965 silver coinage. They do not have to be melted to be worth more than their face value. It will not be long before this little bargain disappears. Take advantage of this easy money while you can. It is just one more example of how fast the USD is devaluing before our eyes.”

  o o o

Reader C.M. mentioned: New Modeling Study Forecasts Disappearance of Existing Climate Zones. C.M.’s comment: “An interesting article on climate change from the National Science Foundation (a government sponsored entity). Apparently, some plant and animal species have already realized the change is happening, and are heading to the hills…at least a cooler part of the hill.”

   o o o

Yet another opinion on Global Warming.



Jim’s Quote of the Day

“There is a certain relief in change, even though it be from bad to worse; as I have found in travelling in a stage-coach, that it is often a comfort to shift one’s position and be bruised in a new place.” – Washington Irving



Note from JWR:

April 19th (Patriot’s Day) is a significant date. It is coincidentally the anniversary of the battles at Lexington and Concord (the opening of America’s war of secession from Britain, in 1775), the German assault on the Warsaw Ghetto (1943) , the FBI/ATF assault on the Branch Davidian church at Waco (1993), and the tragic misdirected Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing (1995).



Letter Re: Advice on Storing E85 Ethanol Fuel

Jim:
Regarding your statement: :”Even E10 (10% ethanol) blended gasoline is highly hygroscopic and can absorb 50 times more water than traditional non-blended gasoline.”
E10 is much more sensitive to the water/alcohol solution separating from the gasoline than E85 is. E10 undergoes separation at around 0.5% water. E85 can absorb about 20% water before separation occurs. – PNG

JWR Replies: That is not entirely correct. An explanatory note from the L.U.S.T. Line Report (on Leaking Underground Storage Tanks): “Ethanol will mix with gasoline,
but it does so reluctantly. Although gasoline is nonpolar, it can only hold up to 0.2 percent dissolved water before the water “drops” out of solution to the bottom of the storage vessel as free water. Conversely, hydrogen bonding allows E10 fuel to hold much more dissolved water than gasoline—approximately 0.5 percent. This is because the energy needed for ethanol and water to hydrogen bond is much lower than the higher energy required to keep ethanol evenly distributed with gasoline. Because of this, ethanol and water will continue to preferentially bond until the ethanol and water drop out of solution, a process known as “phase separation.” A Wikipedia entry on 85 mentions that phase separation of E85 can occur with as little as 1% water contamination: The article states: “In addition to corrosion, there is also a risk of increased engine wear for non-FFV engines that are not specifically designed for operation on high levels (i.e., for greater than 10%) of ethanol. The risk primarily comes in the rare event that the E85 fuel ever becomes contaminated with water. For water levels below approximately 0.5% to 1.0% contained in the ethanol, no phase separation of gasoline and ethanol occurs. For contamination with 1% or more water in the ethanol, phase separation occurs, and the ethanol-water mixture will separate from the gasoline. This can be observed by pouring a mixture of suspected water-contaminated E85 fuel in a clear glass tube, waiting roughly 30 minutes, and then inspecting the sample. If there is water contamination of above 1% water in the ethanol, a clear separation of ethanol-water from gasoline will be clearly visible, with the colored gasoline floating above the clear ethanol-water mixture.” Temperature is a major determining factor in the threshold for phase separation. The lower the temperature, the less tolerance for water. (Phase separation is more likely in cold weather.)

OBTW, later in the same article, there is this useful tidbit of information for wound-be still builders: “For those making their own E85, the risk of introducing water unintentionally into their homemade fuel is relatively high unless adequate safety precautions and quality control procedures are taken. Ethanol and water form an azeotrope such that it is impossible to distill ethanol to higher than 95.6% ethanol purity by weight (roughly 190 proof); regardless of how many times distillation is repeated. Unfortunately, this proof ethanol contains too much water to prevent separation of a mixture of such proof ethanol with gasoline, or to prevent the formation of formic acid during low temperature combustion. Therefore, when making E85, it becomes necessary to remove this residual water. It is possible to break the ethanol and water azeotrope through adding benzene or another hydrocarbon prior to a final rectifying distillation. This takes another distillation (energy consuming) step. However, it is possible to remove the residual water more easily, using 3 angstrom (3A) synthetic zeolite pellets to absorb the water from the mix of ethanol and water, prior to mixing the now anhydrous ethanol with gasoline in an 85% to 15% by volume mixture to make E85. This absorption process is also known as a molecular sieve. The benefit of using synthetic zeolite pellets is that they are essentially comparable to using a catalyst, in being reusable and in not being consumed in the process, and the pellets require only re-heating (perhaps on a backyard grill, in a solar reflector furnace, or with heated carbon dioxide gas collected and saved from the fermentation process) to drive off the water molecules absorbed into the zeolite.

Also BTW, I found the following at a Mercury Marine web site that confirms my assertion that ethanol tanks should be kept as full as possible for long term storage: “A partially full tank is not recommended because the void space above the fuel allows air movement that can bring in water through condensation as the temperature cycles up and down. This condensation potentially becomes a problem.”



Letter Re: HK 416 Gas Piston M16/AR-15 Rifles and Upper Receiver Assemblies

James:
Regarding the HK “416” [gas piston operated M16]s. I found a video about them. Do you think that [semi-auto only variants of] these rifles–or at least upper receivers–will be available to civilians any time soon? Also, do you know if they make a .308 [AR-10] version of the gas [piston] operated .223 you linked to? Thanks, – S.F.

JWR Replies: As background, I should first explain that standard AR-15s, M16s, M4s and AR-10s use gas tube impingement rather than a gas piston to operate their actions. This blows powder fouling back into the action. Heckler und Koch of Germany greatly improved the design with a gas piston upper receiver. (The same thing was first done 20+ years ago by Walt Langendorfer of Rhino Systems, but it took a while for the idea to catch on.) Just a few HK 415/416 uppers have hit the U.S. market thusfar. These are designed and manufactired by POF-USA. Sadly, they do not interchange with original HK-made 416 parts. The uppers sell for around $1,225 each. That is a lot of money for what is just a quasi-clone upper! (For about the same price, you could buy a complete SIG 556 rifle–also gas piston operated–which are finally shipping to dealers in the US. With the passage of time there surely will be many 416s produced and the price will inevitably fall–even for the German-made originals. Also, no doubt, there will be U.S.-made “415” (semi-auto) and “416” (full auto) upper clones (of various quality/parts interchangeability) produced.
My personal prediction is that the families of deployed soldiers in the States and/or soldiers themselves about to deploy to The Big Sandbox will start buying HK 416 uppers at their own expense. (If I were recalled to active duty, then I certainly would!) Ditto for privately purchasing an ACOG TA-01-NSN scope.) I also predict that these uppers will be the source of envy and possibly even threatened Article 15 non judicial punishment charges for the soldiers that take them on overseas deployments. I suspect that the media will get their teeth into this story and will not let go. There will be lots of acrimony (just like with the body armor procurement snafus that led to soldiers buying their own commercial off-the-shelf body armor). The pointed question will be: “Why are we still fielding the jam-prone standard M16s and M4s with a fast-fouling gas tube action, when something better (contributing to soldier safety) is readily available? So eventually Uncle Sam will be shamed into procuring HK-416s (or equivalents) as an upgrade for at least the Combat Arms regiments, if not the entire U.S. Army.

In answer to your second question: I think that with the large number of AR-10 vendors out there, it was inevitable that several of them would start making gas piston uppers that are at least similar to the “416” upper design. The first to hit the market was the POF “P-308” AR-10, but I’m sure that there will soon be others.



Odds ‘n Sods:

Hawaiian K. sent us this: More on honeybee CCD, from Der Spiegel. Are genetically modified crops to blame? And Brian H. sent a link to this article from England that was featured in The Drudge Report, which suggests that cellular phone transmissions might be to blame.

  o o o

From RBS: Sagging Housing Industry hits largest homebuilders

  o o o

Also from RBS, shades of 1929: The NASD issues a rare warning to investors on excessive stock and bond purchases made on margin

  o o o

Reader Jim H. mentioned that Sam’s Club membership warehouse stores are now stocking some long term storage foods.

  o o o

We are pleased to announce that we added GunBroker to our roster of Affiliate Advertisers.



Jim’s Quote of the Day

“By the rude bridge that arched the flood,
Their flag to April’s breeze unfurled;
Here once the embattled farmers stood;
And fired the shot heard round the world.”
– Ralph Waldo Emerson



Notes from JWR:

The mass media is abuzz about the massacre at Virginia Tech, where Cho Seung-Hui, a foreign student used a pair of handguns (9mm and .22 rimfire) to kill 32 unarmed people. The mainstream media pundits are pointing fingers at the college administration that failed to raise an alarm after Cho killed his first two victims, and fled. Two hours later, he killed 30 more students, and then himself. But the issue that the media is failing to ask is: Why were all of his victims unarmed? The answer: Because it was against school policy to have guns on campus, and to be caught with a gun was grounds for expulsion. Blogger Lester Hunt notes: “…in 2005 there was a bill in Virginia that would have allowed students with concealed-carry permits to bring their guns on campus, but it died in committee. (Hat-tip to David Beito here.) The victims of this atrocity had been deliberately disarmed by their own government. Adding horribly to the irony of this is the fact that one Larry Hinker, a Virginia Tech spokesperson, praised the death of this bill: ‘I’m sure the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly’s actions,’ Hinker said on Jan. 31, 2006, ‘because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on our campus.'”

We have seen these massacres played out over and over (and revisited umpteen times on CNN.) One underlying theme is apparent: Mass murderers prefer to do their work in places where they know that they will be facing unarmed victims. Will schools change their “gun free zone” policies because of this incident? I doubt it. All that we will likely see is liberal politicians dancing in the blood, screaming for more “gun control.” SurvivalBlog reader JB in Nashville notes: “[this incident is] …re-igniting the debate on the reinstitution of the assault weapons ban (H.R. 1022.) The impulse to “do something” is powerful. Get your normal-capacity magazines now!”

Be sure to read the commentary by Oleg Volk, as well as the commentary from our correspondent Israel, below.

And I may sound like one of those MK-ULTRA conspiracy theorists, but I have three questions:

1.) Why do so many of these mass murderers conveniently shoot themselves in the head at the end of their killing sprees?

2.) Why are so many of these mass murderers on Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) antidepressants like Zoloft, Paxil, Wellbutrin, Lexapro, Celexa, or Prozac?

3.) Why do so many of these mass murder incidents take place when there is a major piece of gun control legislation already up for consideration by congress?

Today we present another article for Round 10 of the SurvivalBlog non-fiction writing contest. The writer of the best non-fiction article will win a valuable four day “gray” transferable Front Sight course certificate. (Worth up to $1,600.) Second prize is a copy of my “Rawles Gets You Ready” preparedness course, generously donated by Jake Stafford of Arbogast Publishing. I might again be sending out a few complimentary copies of my novel “Patriots” as “honorable mention” awards. If you want a chance to win the contest, start writing and e-mail us your article for Round 10, which ends May 30th. Remember that articles that relate practical “how to” skills for survival will have an advantage in the judging.



Livestock at Your Retreat, by Samantha

Livestock, while not strictly essential to post-TEOTWAWKI survival, are certainly on the to-have list of the majority of all survival-minded individuals. However, it is also a subject rarely broached within those same circles, and concise, laymen’s term pointers are a hard find. For the most part where the U.S. is concerned, what was once knowledge crucial to the survival of men the world round has now dwindled, in effect, to the level of a hobby.
In brief, I’ll cover the three most basic issues which apply to all manner of livestock, and then broach species-specific information. I encourage everyone with even a mild interest in keeping livestock unfamiliar to them to get involved with the animal as soon as possible: most community colleges, for instance, have cost-effective, basic courses concerning animal science of all types.
Space is a governing factor, where livestock are concerned – and will often dictate what sort of livestock you have. A good rule of thumb for larger animals (horses, cattle, llamas, etc.), is that two acres of pasture should be available for every individual. With any less, the pasture can easily become overgrazed, and subsequently barren and/or muddy, which can lead to such diseases as foundering, and may also, via rain runoff, damage any nearby crops. A good ten feet or so of fallow ground should be placed between crops and pastures, to greatly reduce damaging runoff and also to give grasses a ‘handhold’ from which they can always re-establish themselves into the pasture. (A brief, comprehensive guide to pasture management can be found here.)
Feed is critically important, and most animals eat a surprising amount. Some animals, like goats, can forage for themselves quite effectively in almost any season, if left to their own devices in a large enough enclosure. Others, notably cattle and horses, have been raised so that they expect food – grain and hay – to be brought to them periodically during all seasons, most importantly winter, and have generally lost the ability to winter themselves. Will you have enough acreage to grow enough hay to last your animals through the winter? Or the tools to harvest and bale it? An interesting solution to this is to mix corn stalks with hay. When done in a fairly small ratio, this roughage has no adverse effects on the animal, and can greatly extend the life of your hay supply. Another alternative would be to purchase animals raised to winter on their own: but these animals are often under-socialized to human contact, and can be a bit of a handful to manage.
Futurity. You’re not keeping these animals to have eaten them all within a season – you’re wanting to create a sustainable ecosystem. Look at your retreat location critically, and find animals suited and accustomed to the terrain and climates. Then look even more critically at the animals you want to stock it. For most big-time livestock operations, a certain amount of line breeding in stock is acceptable: you want to avoid this when choosing the few individual animals that are going to be your potential lifeline, especially with smaller animals that have frequent breeding cycles. Letting rabbits or chickens inbreed out of neglect is one of the fastest ways to reduce their utility (especially as feed animals), so keeping males and females separate, and creating breeding records, can be a sure lifesaver. With bigger stock (cattle, horses, etcetera…) inbreeding is less of a problem, but should still be a concern: few people have the land, finances, and know-how to manage herds of livestock, which reduces your potential gene pool immensely. With luck, a neighbor might allow you breeding rights to a bull or stallion for a modest barter fee – and on the other hand, keeping an in-tact male on hand might offer similarly rewarding opportunities for trade. As a special note, extremely few fish breeders care about inbreeding in their stock: typically, only fish with very obvious malformations are destroyed. It’s a good idea, if you’re going to stock a pond, to buy your fish from at least two different vendors.
Horses:
My top-choice breed of horse for post-apocalyptic living would be a BLM-captured Mustang [feral horse]. These animals aren’t much to look at, but they’re small and hardy. When other horses are thin in winter, waiting at the gates for hay, these animals will be fat and glossy, digging up grass roots to eat. They prosper naturally in almost every type of terrain and climate, and are priced at a steal. At BLM auctions, a single horse will usually sell for between 100 and 300 dollars. This, of course, means you’re stuck with a wild horse, but the BLM also sells trained-to-ride Mustangs at a gently higher price. Most of these horses weren’t sold at their first or second auctions, and then trained through prison good-behavior programs. Runner up would be a Percheron. These are draft horses, so they’re more than capable of carrying or pulling an extraordinary weight – and they’re often trained to ride, drive, and occasionally even plow. Typically, most drafts have a slow and easygoing temperament, which is an especially key trait if you have children. Since drafts are rather ‘out of fashion’, you can usually get a well-bred, well-trained horse for between 1 and 3 thousand. Often these horses are sold in driving pairs at deep discounts. There are hundreds of breeds of horses, and it’s a good idea to stick to ‘working’ breeds. The ‘eventing’ breeds tend to be more high strung, and their popularity often results in bad breeding practices.
Cattle:
If you’re wanting to maximize the utility of your cattle, you want a breed that gives a high meat return but is also good for milking. For this (and especially if you’re new to cattle), I would recommend Brown Swiss. These animals are slow and gentle to the point of extreme lethargy, making them easy handling even for young children. Calving is easily one of the hardest parts of owning cattle – the list of possible complications is extraordinary – and these cattle are rather renowned for their easy time of it. They’re hardy and don’t need much looking after, and are very suitable for colder climates. If you’re looking to maximize the lifelong utility of your cattle, the South Devon is a safe bet. Again, calving is a big part of owning cattle, which is what warrants this breed as second choice – they’ve been aptly nicknamed ‘the maternal beef’. These cattle, unlike most, produce milk and calves well into their teens.
As a special note, miniature cattle are starting to gain popularity, and as I don’t have any experience with them, I won’t be so brash as to make the recommendation: however, I have heard a lot of positive things from small family beef farms about their utility, especially for small acreage, and I encourage others to look it up.
Small Ruminants:
For the most part, I recommend sheep more than goats; they’re less predisposed to sickness, and are generally much less ornery. If you’re prepared to acquire a herding dog, sheep are much easier to herd and shift than goats, and there is the added benefit of their fleece (but if you don’t want to go through the trouble of de-fleecing, there are some breeds of sheep without wool). However, with sheep, there is a notable safety concern: do not, under any circumstances let pregnant women near lambing ewes, because the same chemical that triggers aborting in ewes can trigger aborting in women. If you’re not terribly concerned with wool yield or quality, I recommend Suffolk sheep.
Goats revert to their feral state faster than any other domestic animal with the exception of the house cat. In my experience, they are notorious escapees, a bit on the sickly side, and take a considerable amount of physical wrangling to manage. However, if they suit your fancy, I would recommend the Kinder breed, hands down. They’re medium sized dual-purpose goats (milk and meat), and does average out in maturity as about 115 pounds. They have between 3 to 6 kids a year, which will each weigh around 80 pounds in 14 months… They are extremely efficient meat converters.
Fowl:
Geese and ducks can be just as useful as chickens, generally because they’ll tend to feed themselves more often. One thing few consider about raising chickens is the fact that a good deal of corporate-bought chicks won’t sit their eggs – which can definitely present a problem, if you’re hoping to have more than one generation of chickens. A good way to work around this is to either just buy mature brooding hens from a small farmer, or one hen and her brood. Just as with cattle and small ruminants, there are dual-purpose breeds: breeds which are both good egg layers and have a high meat yield: Dominiques, Orpingtons, and Plymouth Rocks are all good for the job. If you want to slowly get used to the idea of owning chickens before going so far as to own a flock, country feed stores and the like will often sell color-dyed chicks for Easter (they can make an educational present for children). I recommend chickens very highly, because they’re small and hardy enough that you can keep them anywhere – even in the city, so long as you have a modest backyard – and not only will you have the benefit of fresh eggs every day, and the best chicken you’ve ever tasted – but you will be that much more prepared when the grid goes down, and the supermarkets are empty. A really great site about getting involved with raising chickens while living in the city can be found here.



The Virginia Shootings, Israel, and the Shoah, by David in Israel

Today we see again a senseless shooting in an American city on the same day we observe the remembrance of the Shoah. Sadly an innocent Jew who survived all of these years after being delivered from the Nazi death machine gave his life trying to disarm the attacker. Rumanian-born Prof. Liviu Librescu, 75 was an Israeli citizen and taught engineering at Virginia Tech where the shooting occurred. May his family be comforted among the mourners of Zion and Jerusalem. Had Prof. Librescu been in Israel his home perhaps the end of the story would have been different. Israelis
carry their weapons. Since the ’73 war every soldier on leave must carry their rifle most of the time and anyone else with a permit (settlers and others with a reason to carry) are actively encouraged by the police to carry their weapon when in public. Had this happened here the likelihood that this killer being neutralized quickly is high, unfortunately schools and colleges in the US have become “gun free”
a very safe place for a killer to do their work without being interrupted.
We are very careful that Innocent life including one’s own must be protected as we learn in Talmud Sanhedrin, discussing the burglar, mentioned in the Torah, who tunnels in knowing he may have to confront and kill the homeowner. We learn that if a person is coming up to kill you you must go up and kill him first.
That said I must admit that both times in university I carried, which was against the university rules. Fortunately there were no deadly metal detectors on campus at the time so my classmates had some protection from murderers. Unfortunately nobody saw fit to ignore the student rule book on Monday and they lost a chance to save many innocent lives.



Odds ‘n Sods:

The high bid in the SurvivalBlog benefit auction is now at $300. This auction is for a scarce pre-1899 Mauser that was arsenal converted to 7.62mm NATO. It has a retail value of $375. The auction ends on May 15th. Just e-mail me your bid. Thanks!

  o o o

RBS pointed us to this commentary by Dr. Irwin Kellner: End of housing bubble should have been obvious to everyone

  o o o

$40 Million Worth of MREs Spoiled as FEMA Ran Out of Space

   o o o

“Hiker” noted this warning issued by John Rubino, about the “SLV” Silver exchange traded fund (ETF). In essence, there is no sure substitute for holding precious metals carefully hidden at home in your personal possession