“Literally, Your ATM Won’t Work…”. – T.P.
o o o
OPEC Set To Play The Waiting Game
o o o
The crisis in housing: Not enough homes are being built and rents are outstripping wage gains.
o o o
Your Facebook, Twitter and blog are about to be monitored for references to the Government. – H.L.
o o o
JWR joins Prepper Recon for a podcast: Time is Short, Wake Up!
o o o
More and more, the words once shouted with such emphatic fervor, “Never Again!” are being changed and mumbled as “Never mind.” – Brazil starts counting their Jews – B.B.
o o o
Public Locked Out of Miami Biscayne National Park – No Fishing. – T.P.
o o o
5th person dies of MERS virus in South Korea. – G.P. (Warning: This page has a text article but auto starts a video as well)
“When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them.” – Tamara Keel, Editor of the View From The Porch blog
On June 7th, 1776, Richard Henry Lee of Virginia proposed to the Continental Congress a resolution calling for a Declaration of Independence.
Some so-called “experts” believe that future threats to our safety and well-being will come from our children. In a manner of speaking, they are correct in their assumptions. However, you need only watch the evening news to see that the future has already arrived. Read on.
Los Angeles, California District Attorney, Gil Garcetti, probably best summed it up when he said, “My God, this could happen to me . . . What is going on here?” Garcetti was in a news conference describing what was being called the “Wrong Way Shooting” of an innocent, little, three year old girl whose uncle turned onto a gang-infested street in Los Angeles. The precious little girl was killed by indiscriminate (gang) gunfire.
Gang violence is perhaps what the future holds, according to a number of recognized authorities in the field of criminal study, sociology, and psychology. Patrick F. Fagan, a Fitzgerald Fellow with the think-tank Heritage Foundation in Washington D.C., has an insightful and thought-provoking thesis on the subject of violent crime. In his thesis, Fagan stated, “Though overall crime rates have dropped slightly (emphasis added) in America in recent years, the frightening news is that both the level and viciousness of teenage crime have been rising steadily.”
On October 1, 1997, CBS news anchor, Dan Rather, reported Department of Justice figures showing that adults committing murders has dropped by 27 percent. On the surface, this appears to be good news. However, in this same news report, Rather reported that murders committed by teens has risen 141 percent! How does this bode with Fagan’s statement about an overall drop in crime rates? You be the judge!
Professor James Fox, a North Eastern University Criminologist stated, “Thirty-nine million children, 11 years old and over don’t have full-time adult supervision between the hours of 3:00pm and dinner time.” Fox further said that this is a “recipe for a coming crime wave. By the year 2005 a blood bath of teen violence will occur.” I’ve got news for Fox, it is already happening! Fox’s solution to the problem has been to “spend more money on (social) programs.” This is clearly the view that most Liberals hold as a solution to all our problems; they say that it is necessary to spend more money! This approach hasn’t worked yet.
Adam Wolinski, a noted criminal justice “expert”, expressed his solution when he said, “We literally need 500,000 cops on the streets at a cost of 30 billion dollars.”
Neither Fox nor Wolinski have confronted the real root cause of violent crime in America. Rather, Patrick Fagan believes that the cause is “the breakdown of the family.” Statistics and history back-up Fagan’s thoughts on this all-important subject.
While many so-called “experts” in law enforcement tend to point toward poverty or racial make-up as the primary cause of teen violent crime, Fagan pointed toward failed government programs that actually encourage the break-up of the family.
The 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which was nothing more than cleverly disguised gun control and social spending by the Clinton Administration, is just the latest example of an experiment doomed for failure. It provided for billions of dollars in new spending, and it also added at least 15 new social (or should that be “socialist”) programs, on top of the already overburdened welfare system, which has cost taxpayers over five trillion dollars since the ill-conceived War on Poverty that President Lyndon Johnson declared.
Fagan cited that “since 1965, welfare spending has increased 800 percent in real terms, while the number of major felonies per capita is roughly three times the rate prior to 1960.” Fagan continued, “Official Washington also believes that race is the second most important cause of crime.” Fagan disagrees! “However, a closer look at the data shows that the real variable is not race, but family structure and all that it implies in terms of commitment and love between adults and children. A major 1988 study of 11,000 individuals found that the percentage of single-parent households with children between the ages of 12 and 20 is significantly associated with rates of violent crime and burglary.” Taking this study at face value, it would appear that illegitimacy, not race, is the key factor in teenage violent crime.
It would indeed appear that the future holds a bleak picture for all Americans. Within the next twelve to twenty years the American illegitimacy rate is predicted to reach 50 percent.
The homicide rates of major cities have steadily increased according to Fagan. “Between 1989 and 1990, for example, the homicide rate for Boston, MA increased by over 40 percent; Denver, CO rose by 29 percent; Chicago, IL, Dallas, TX, and New Orleans, LA by more than 20 percent; Los Angeles, CA by 16 percent; New York, NY by 11 percent.” This is certainly street combat by any definition. Anyone who believes they are safer on the streets today than they were 25 years ago is sadly (and dead) wrong!
If indeed, as some “experts” claim, violent crime is a result of poverty and/or race, then why, during the Great Depression of the 1920’s, did the crime rate drop when many individuals and families were at their lowest rung on the financial ladder? Why then, during the recession of 1982, was there a dip in crime and not an increase?
Senator Phil Gramm of Texas rightly observed, “If social spending stopped crime, America would be the safest country in the world.” It is not!
The current Federal budget battle that is currently (and always) taking place in Washington, DC focuses (once again) on social(ist) spending. The Administration is determined to increase social spending rather than decrease it! Social spending buys votes! Sadly, it also buys a future of violent crime among our teens.
As Dan Rather stated, “Crime does not (emphasis added) come out of nowhere.” This was a surprising (and true) statement coming from the left-wing controlled press.
In past decades, the murder rate for young black males tripled, and it doubled for young white males. Why is it that the latest government statistics insist that violent crime is down overall? Could it be that certain crimes have been “reclassified” by the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice, and thus, are no longer classified as “violent”? Or perhaps, we’re being sold a false bill of goods, and the federal statistics are being “doctored”? You be the judge.
The Christian Broadcasting Network’s The 700 Club aired a news story that may have dispelled the myth that race and poverty are factors in teenage violent crime. Reporter Randall Brooks investigated the school system in Fairfax, VA, which has one of the highest (if not the highest) per capita income in the nation. At that time, Fairfax schools were the 11th largest in the nation, yet they were facing a steady rise in violent crime in the public schools and on the streets. Violent crime by teens was up 61 percent since 1991. Juveniles with guns in public schools was reported to be up 118 percent since 1989, and drug arrests of teens was up 208 percent. Clearly, high or increased income (or wealth) was not a factor in reducing teen violence.
CBS News correspondent, Bill Whitaker, reported that during the first three quarters of 1995 there were over 400 gang-related deaths in Los Angeles alone. This figure doesn’t take into account murders as a result of armed robberies, rapes, or other violent deaths, either. This figure only takes into account “gang-related” deaths where gang members killed gang members. How many gang members killed innocent civilians? The Los Angeles Police Department reported that more than 40 years ago, there were approximately 125 street gangs with a total membership of 25,000. Just about two decades later, Los Angeles boasted over 1,000 street gangs with a membership in excess of 150,000 members!
During all this time, social spending and social programs increased. During President Clinton’s administration, he funded (with your tax dollars) “midnight” basketball games, which promoted illegitimacy and did nothing to reduce violent crime with all his increased spending. Since then, other social programs were attempted.
Ben Kinchlow, the author’s friend and the former co-host of The 700 Club, cited a perfect example of what we’re talking about. On the program, Kinchlow presented a rich “uncle” who told all his male nephews to go out and sleep with as many young girls as they like. He said it was also okay for these young girls to get pregnant and have babies. This rich uncle said it’s all okay, don’t worry about it. The rich uncle says he will support the girls and their illegitimate children, as long as the nephews don’t marry them. The rich “uncle” in this case is “Uncle Sam”, and this is “his” policy.
By promoting illegitimacy and rewarding the participants, “Uncle Sam” is in fact promoting violent crime among our youth. This is yet another failed government “experiment,” and it’s not only a waste of tax payer dollars, but it also leads to the deaths of many honest, law-abiding tax payers.
Ora Watson is the Executive Principal of Town View Center, a public school in Dallas, Texas. This school is manned with closed circuit cameras and armed security guards. Watson stated during an interview on CNN, “We live in a ‘social’ environment where, unfortunately, security measures are necessary that were not necessary 25 years ago.” Truer words were never spoken. The failed social programs that were started by the liberal Democrats and supported by sympathetic Republicans have resulted in unprecedented security measures in our schools, homes, and on the street.
These so-called “security measures” promote the violation of our Constitutional rights, as outlined in the first, second, and fourth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America.
Increased social spending and the continuance of the welfare system, as it stands today, will only provide us with more violent (and deadly) crimes upon innocent Americans by our children. Indeed, the “threats of the future are here – today!”
Just remember the title of this book as you leave your home today, or next time you see a group of “children” approaching you.
Remember, this is Street Combat – This Ain’t No Game!
Hugh,
There is no way a civilian can develop the proper mindset, skills, and base of knowledge required to be considered a “warrior” by attending a class for a weekend or even a week. Please do not misunderstand what I am trying to say. Classes like this can be beneficial to an individual as long as they do not leave the false impression that a warrior has been created. This false belief can lead someone to get hurt if they respond with inflated confidence during an actual life-threatening situation. There is no way to become a warrior, unless you make it your profession. The amount of training required for an action to become “muscle memory” is immense. J.H. did mention situational awareness (SA). The best high threat engagement a civilian can have is the one he or she avoids. Proper SA can save someone from having to draw a gun while unfamiliar adrenaline courses through their arteries and the targets are shooting back. If an encounter is unavoidable, then SA can place an individual in the best possible tactical position to win the engagement. The difference is that warriors have signed up to go into harm’s way for other people’s benefit, not their own. We did not accidentally bump into a bad man one night; we purposely pursue him in the darkness. We do bad things to bad people.
The military knows how to train their warriors, though funding may get in the way of bringing that know-how to the average line unit Joe. Mastering a skill takes constant repetition, reviewing the basics, and training these skills in an arena that can induce adrenaline. I have seen soldiers, who can smoothly draw a pistol and shoot paper accurately all day on the flat range, lose their minds while conducting force on force Simunitions(TM) training that promises to hurt and leave bruises, if not break the skin. I have seen competent soldiers lose their bearing in combat because none of their training prepared them for the real deal. True warriors are born with a mindset that is refined through training. It is misleading to sell someone the notion they are a warrior by attending a class. Being a warrior is a lifestyle.
HJL Responds: I believe that the definitions that we are using may not be the same. What you define as a “Warrior”, I would have defined as a “High Speed Operator”. I would have defined a “Warrior” as simply someone who is willing to escalate a conflict to violence, if necessary, to ensure that the object of their affection is afforded protection. Because we live in a culture defined by movies, we often believe that we have this capability. The reality is that few people do. J.H. was willing to take the first steps to begin to train his body and mind to accept what is necessary to become that warrior. Whether it is unarmed martial arts, weapons handling, computer hacking, or offensive/defensive driving, you have to start somewhere. Every person that I know who has taken that first class has come away with a drastically different outlook on the escalation of violence.
With deadly martial arts, the initial contact is the most dangerous to an individual. The more violent contact you survive, the higher the likelihood of your continued survival, simply because you learn to adapt, respond, and anticipate. The whole point of classes like Gunsite or any other martial art is to create an environment where that initial violent contact can be made under controlled conditions and your survival can be guaranteed, while you learn to adapt. While a man willing to protect his home and village is not necessarily a high speed operator (mostly because he has not had the thousands of hours of training required to attain that skill level), he is still a warrior just because of his willingness to place others above himself and escalate the situation to the level of violence required to guarantee the outcome. He is a mighty man of valor.
“And there came an angel of the Lord, and sat under an oak which was in Ophrah, that pertained unto Joash the Abi-ezrite: and his son Gideon threshed wheat by the winepress, to hide it from the Midianites. And the angel of the Lord appeared unto him, and said unto him, The Lord is with thee, thou mighty man of valour.” Judges 6:11-12 (KJV)
Is The Price Of Gold Really Headed Above $19,000?
o o o
IMF has betrayed its mission in Greece, captive to EMU creditors. – JBG
o o o
Why The Fed Can’t Raise Rates. – J.B.
o o o
Canadian Silver Maple Leaf Sales Hit New Record Q1 2015
o o o
Items from Mr. Econocobas:
Investors Start To Panic As A Global Bond Market Crash Begins – Whether the trend continues and gets out of control or for the time being things turn around, I am not sure, but this is something to follow.
The Fat Lady Hums A Few Notes. – B.B.
o o o
Parents call on school’s chief to resign after Smitten Kitten field trip. – H.L.
o o o
o o o
Urban Warfare Exercise Starts Without a Warning. – J.R.
o o o
Entire police dept. disbanded after councilwoman and her son were arrested. – JBG
“And one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, and with a loud voice glorified God, and fell down on his face at his feet, giving him thanks: and he was a Samaritan.” Luke 17:15-16 (KJV)
Camping Survival is moving to Sanford, North Carolina (near Raleigh) soon and has a few open positions. If you are interested in any of the positions, please send a resume per the instructions. You may also want to check out their moving clearance section. Also, June 7th-13th they are having a Mountain House sale with 25% off of #10 cans and 15% off of pouches and buckets. It’s always better to sell it than move it, so be sure to check it out.
o o o
Today, we present another entry for Round 59 of the SurvivalBlog non-fiction writing contest. The $12,000+ worth of prizes for this round include:
First Prize:
Second Prize:
Third Prize:
Round 59 ends on July 31st, so get busy writing and e-mail us your entry. Remember that there is a 1,500-word minimum, and that articles on practical “how to” skills for survival have an advantage in the judging.
The following is a response addressing concerns of those to whom a proposed “Plan B” bug-out scheme had been provided by a larger, existing group to multiple smaller groups. This larger group had extended an invitation to smaller groups that are lacking the financial and over-all resources of that larger group. This is a series of responses that have been/were made to the chief “officers” of the smaller groups. The basic proposal is for a 60-day, temporary sheltering at a safe location with provision capabilities for a larger group of individuals and families beyond the recognized community/core member group. This is provided so that if your group is looking at a similar situation, you can use it as a basis to get started.
The word “exigent” is defined in criminal law as “an emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property.” There is no ready litmus test for determining whether such circumstances exist, and in each case the extraordinary situation must be measured based upon the facts known by officials. The circumstances are those that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to persons. I’ve used the term “exigent” for a good reason. It is taken a bit out of the normal legal context, but it is very appropriate for what we are considering and has been proposed. We are talking about extraordinary circumstances. We are talking about preventing loss of life to those we think we might be able to save (and will do their best to aid, not detract or weaken, those who they seek assistance from).
Let’s get all concerns, or as much as possible, out of the way right here right now. It goes hand-in-hand with the organizational needs of any and all groups. As the tentative leader of your group, it will be to you that your group’s individuals will (and must) direct their questions. It’s not me nor anyone who is a member of the community group in the bylaw papers who they will seek. It is the only way any such operation can or will work properly.
I’ll mention “ifs” later, but you neglected the biggest “if” in your question; it’s the part about “if you want us to stay…” That is a big ‘if’, all right. Remember the word “exigent” and the circumstances surrounding this proposal– extraordinary circumstances.
All people need to think of their futures. At 60 days, hopefully all will have some idea of what is to be done next. Your eventual goal is to have your own home, or to return to salvage, rebuild, and restore what was once yours. None of us believe in communism. None of us wish for some hippie-style communal living for our futures– at least none I know of in the community. Are we not all free Americans, able to think for ourselves, be, live, do for ourselves? I often reflect that this entire prepping process has seen the strangest of mergers of the oldschool flower-power days with a military adjunct. It isn’t. We’re trying to retain what was built upon– our rights, lives, liberties, and the pursuit of happiness. None of us embody or consider any other ideas of those four things as some universal constraints to be applied to all other Americans. However, we certainly allow for others to seek their own meanings to these.
Just remember, beyond a safe location, water, some basic triage medical facilities, a defense network, and a lot of jobs that will need to be filled and done, everyone will work without exception– no one is exempt, and everyone will have a task and be expected to do it (multiple tasks) to the very best of their ability.
The democratic process does not exist on private property. I use the example that if I visit a home and am invited into the living room and then find that I need to use the head/john, I ask, “May I use the facilities?” If granted a “yes”, I then ask, “Where is it located?” Upon receiving that answer and permission, it means only that I may use the plumbing. It does not mean that I may wander around the house opening cabinets and drawers in any room I may pass or see. That same rule applies to the community site. The case where I might be denied use of the head/john means what? It means that I must leave and seek relief elsewhere. Otherwise, I may hold it and stay put, as uncomfortable as I might be. My proposal needs to be understood as it is intended and not as it is assumed to be, hoped to be, or even perhaps as anyone thinks it should be. It must be taken just as it is. It’s fairly simple, and though I personally hate the word “fair” because I do not believe there exists such a phenomena as “fair” upon this earth in this life, I do feel it could actually be just that– fair. It is an offer, a proposal, simple, direct, and up to the persons being offered what they will make of it.
Sure. You would leave. You’d take what you brought with you and simply depart, and you would not be allowed to return. You’d be asked to be silent, considered maybe not an enemy but never again a part of the group in terms of any demand or assistance you may require down the road.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” , nor will the group. Regarding the freedom of speech, we as people do need to talk and to exercise the ability to speak, or so it seems. However, this situation would not be a democracy. Once again, I must repeat what I’ve said; there is and would be a strict chain of command. A private or a recruit does not address or demand an audience with an officer in the military…ever. Speech amongst yourselves is fine, but to the community it’s only to your immediate person responsible for you…only. Read the amendments.
We are of four parts– physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual. All must act in concert. All must grow and become together, equally, as we are those.
You tell me. You will be allotted a space. You can park a camper, pitch a tent, or live in a car or truck or van. That is your responsibility. As long as you can be able to leave within a 30-minute time span. That time limit is not chosen randomly. It is for multiple reasons. That’s the best possible guess as to a maximum amount of time it would require for all to bug-out of the area if push came to shove. Never forget that nowhere is completely safe in a world like we’d be living in, if it had already necessitated such a mass of people seeking security as they had and were there at the community site at the time. In addition, permanence is not a “given” for anyone who is “exigent”. No tolerance of wrong-doing would be shown. Thirty minutes is all it should take to prepare a bug out to get to the site, and it’s all it should take to leave it.
Showers would be communal at a central facility, unless your vehicle provides its own facility and the means to keep it running/filled. Water rationing is a must. Always remember that. Life would have changed or you would not be out there. There is no long leisurely bathing to be expected or provided for. Hark back a hundred years, say to pre-WWII days. People did not bathe daily, and when they did, often they bathed as a family. In short, you will stink at times. You learn to live with it.
There is an existing septic system, recently improved, but like any system, it can’t exist without maintenance. Any system’s operation is dependent for proper operation on the simple fact of how many are utilizing it. Gone are the days of flushing the toilet and “that’s that”; there is no more thought given. If you are there at the community site, you most likely will have as one of many chores the constant digging of the latrine ditch-works or similar facilities at some point. Think militarily. Finally, septic hygiene is an excellent question all in all. It is something that must be fully understood by all and thought of. No tolerance of relieving oneself wherever the urge pressed you to go would or could be safely allowed, especially with more people. Diseases, medieval in nature, would rapidly appear. Cholera, typhus, dysentery and so on are not good ways to die.
Boy, I had to really rein myself in here on answering this one. You need to study up. You can dig a hole to gain some cooling effects. You can shade your provisions, but this is *** (a southern state)*** and it gets hot here, miserably hot and humid. All foodstuffs need to be able to endure the climate or be discarded once it’s gone bad. Read up on dry goods– rice, flour, sugar, beans, dried meat and fish, canned goods, dehydrated or freeze-dried foods, and salt. That last item will be the most crucial. Salt, vinegar, or brine will be the primary preservative for our needs, if such a calamitous event does occur to cause us all to leave our homes and seek shelter at the community. Climate control? One good and viable suggestion is to look up Zeer pots. Those would assist and do a fair job of somewhat of a climate-control mechanism for food, and they are possible. Otherwise, like the question about a shower facility, the answer is for you to bring a fridge along that you can fuel or power on your own, and be sure it doesn’t fall outside of the noise restrictions that may be in place. Then, you’ve got something cool.
The listing of medical supplies for exigent members is for your own familial uses, primarily. The community also needs knowledge of what medical– physical and psychological– conditions are present at the site, as a part of the make-up of all persons present. Additionally, medications would make good barter goods. They would also be a good way to contribute to the community, if they are non-essential surplus to your own medical needs. Of course, a good chemist is always being sought by the community.
Mr. Latimer,
Lately it’s becoming quite clear that the global financial system has passed the point of no return and is essentially doomed. My question now is, when the system begins its meltdown, those who will be able to get their money out before it’s all lost will no doubt be putting that money into hard assets as fast as they can. This of course will cause gold and silver to skyrocket. So here’s the question, should I sell my gold and silver at these fantastically high prices and receive a lot of paper money, which may become worthless due to hyperinflation, or illegal to keep as cash, or risky to put in a bank? Or do I sell half of the silver and gold and try to buy other hard assets while prices still are reasonable?
It is hard to find sound and honest financial advice in these upside-down, whacked out financial times, so I turn to SurvivalBlog, where I know I will get a straight story. – TWT
HJL Responds: In a time of economic upheaval, obtaining equipment, parts, spares, and supplies will most likely be exceedingly difficult, so the basics need to be covered first. If you have PMs but you do not have food, life will get expensive in a hurry because you cannot eat PMs. Traditionally, PMs do not fare very well during the economic upheaval because an established barter market does not generally exist and people have difficulty in shifting their thinking from valuing things in fiat dollars to whatever the market wants. Your comment about selling for “fantastically high prices” is an example of the difficulty in transitioning how we value things and we all have this difficulty. PMs do work very well for holding value through the economic upheaval until the market is somewhat stabilized though. Understand that if the established market is a grey or black market, PMs will generally hold less value if you use them than would a commodity that is in demand at the time. For this reason, the standard advice is to make sure the Beans, Bullets, and Band-aids are taken care of first. Then make sure any tangible assets that could be required are dealt with (tractor, spare parts, tools). Consider debt relief, then start thinking about storing value in PMs for the other side of a crises. Anytime you can deal directly with a commodity that is in demand rather than PMs, your position will improve. Consider fiat money only as required to deal with obligations that have no other way to satisfy them. If you already hold PMs and do not have the basics covered or debt relieved, consider selling the PMs now and taking care of those issues.
If cash becomes illegal, there will be an alternative market that picks up, but your ability to transition from the regulated market to the alternative market will be controlled by your debt to the financial institutions and the taxes collected by whatever government is in place. Obviously, the less stake you have in either of those two institutions, the more freedom you have in your own financial affairs.
o o o
Cash-Strapped Kansas Moves To Limit ATM Withdrawals For Residents On Welfare. – D.S.
o o o
Items from Mr. Econocobas:
Greece Unable To Make €300 Million IMF Payment, Requests “Bundling”
Video- David Stockman Fox TV Interview: The Most Fantastic Bubble In Recorded History
US Added 280,000 Jobs in May; But Jobless Rate Edged Up to 5.5%
A great precedent has been set for our Fourth Amendment Rights: Cop Who Arrested Man for Legally Carrying Gun Gets Sued
o o o
There might be no saving the world’s top banana Another reason why it is critical that people continue to plant non-GMO heirloom seeds of all kinds to add variety to food sources. Having only one viable strain (in this case shippable) risks doing without someday. Corporations, such as Monsanto and others, have moved towards just a FEW GMO varieties and use heavy-handed tactics to “force” farmers, even in third-world countries to use ONLY their seeds and sell Roundup, which is toxic. – H.L.
o o o
An update to an earlier story: Comments disabled/censored at “Letter to stingy American consumers”. I went back to re-read comments between yesterday and tonight; I noticed this articled was disabled from receiving more comments. Also of note is that at least two dozen comments have been removed, which had no offensive profanity, but all the missing comments made reference to some combination of pitchforks, boiled rope or guillotines. – formerly middle class America
o o o
Egg rationing in America has officially begun. – JBG
o o o
o o o
A brief “Must Read” essay, over at the Paratus Famalia blog: To Quiet the Dry Bones of Liberty
“And it came to pass, when the ark set forward, that Moses said, Rise up, Lord, and let thine enemies be scattered; and let them that hate thee flee before thee. And when it rested, he said, Return, O Lord, unto the many thousands of Israel.” Numbers 10:35-36 (KJV)