E-Mail 'The Survivalist's Odds 'n Sods:' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'The Survivalist's Odds 'n Sods:' to a friend

* Required Field






Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.



Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.


E-Mail Image Verification

Loading ... Loading ...

9 Comments

  1. Full comment at

    https://dissenter.com/discussion/begin?url=https%3A%2F%2Fantoniusaquinas.com%2F2019%2F02%2F28%2Fthe-constitution-myth%2F

    What bothers me is the Pollyanna and Pangloss applied to the Articles of Confederation so it would have been Utopia if we didn’t get the constitution. More likely it would be worse as it was 13 groups of men instead of one rule of law, and the individual states voted on the Constitution where the worries ended up with the Bill of Rights. That is hardly ramrodding things through. No paper can prevent the corruption of men.

    There was an attempt to leave – would it have been better if the Confederacy lost to the Union? I can do that timeline too and make a far better case.

    That said, most people who revere the Constitution mean the pre-Wilsonian version (up to the 15th amendment) without the judicial activism (the nine black robed horrors with secret decoder rings that see emanations and penumbras, but not the plain text). Then I’d give more power to the people and states, especially today with all the tech, for official methods of secession and nullification.

    The Bible is inspired by God but no two men can agree on what it says and what our duty is under its inspired text. The Constitution was much simpler but we can’t even follow those rules, but cheat, especially with the corrupt judicial referees. But the problem is not that the Constitution is bad, it is that we are too fallen and have fallen so far we can’t make it work. The Soviet Union had a Constitution too.

  3. Antonius Aquinas knows neither his European history nor the Constitution. The only problem with our Constitution is that it has never been enforced. Look for a group and a plan called, “Tactical Civics”. Thanks for this wonderful site.

  4. Is a civil war coming?

    I certainly hope so. We need civil war to purge the socialists/communists from our country once and for all. If we fail to do so, we will all loose our freedoms.

    I don’t understand why we are waiting for the inevitable. It has to come, it must come, or we are lost as a country.

  6. While it sounds sexy for every exotic article of military hardware to be associated with Navy Seals (and their attached public relations teams) SADMs were “normally” planned for employment by regular combat engineers (you know the same ones who had to rescue the SEALS during Operation Just Cause). I know this both from my training as a combat engineer officer and through ten years of experience in war planning for fifth corps across the Fulda gap. I’m sure seals were trained to employ SADMs, but that would have been the exception, not the rule.

  7. The reason there is a civil war coming is us “small government” types just want to be left to our homesteads in peace to raise our families the way we wish to.

    Those in the “Hillary Archipelago” can not make their own places function – Typhus and Hepatitis in LA, Feces on the streets of SanFran… S___hole?. But they wish to inject our newborns with who knows what to vaccinate them against sexually transmitted disease and insure they go to Government School indoctrination centers where they will be left dumb, ignorant, complacent, and malleable. And we can’t be allowed guns. Or speech. Or due process. Or (see vaccinations) juries to decide matters over $20 as the 7th amendment says.

    But if they keep kicking the hornets nests, they will be stung. Hard.

  8. Normally I’d make a long comment about the possibility of civil war, but everything has been said that should be said. It’s coming, and how bad it gets is up to them.

    The problem is the neo-liberal/neo-conservative cabal that runs Washington, DC and virtually all the state capitals. It’s really too bad the Demoreps and Republicrats never learned how to read. It’s really not that hard. Somehow they read things in that aren’t there and ignore the things that are. They say; “If it doesn’t say we can’t, we can.” Yet it clearly does say; If it doesn’t say you can, you can’t! It’s called the 10th amendment. They say, “We tell you what the limits of your rights are.” Yet it clearly says; our rights are vast, far beyond the first eight amendments! It’s called the ninth amendment. They decry the fact that the bill of rights are negative rights. They’re right, they are negative to the governments, “congress shall make no law”, “shall not be infringed”, etc. The rest all set limitations on the various governments and the actions they are allowed to take against us, they do not set limits on us.

    The constitution isn’t bad, it’s not even badly written. The problem is that it requires honorable men and women who respect the oath’s they take and the people they swore to serve. That kind of honor exists in a very few people in government. It’s a sad state of affairs and because of it there will be a new war of independence. It will make the last war of independence look like church social by comparison.

Comments are closed.