(Continued from Part 1. This concludes the article.)
Let’s Assume
Let’s assume that that Washington determines the need for renewing civil defense, when would it happen and what might it entail? Based on FEMA’s most recent “guidance” found in “NUCLEAR DETONATION RESPONSE GUIDANCE- PLANNING FOR THE FIRST 72 HOURS” released on March 2023, upon a nuclear attack warning being issued, state and local officials should “issue immediate shelter-in-place notifications”. That is great except for this little thing called “reality”.
In FEMA’s own 2022 National Household Survey, that polls people about their level of disaster preparedness, only 33% have assembled supplies for a disaster. Based on other past disaster preparedness surveys by others, the poll should read 33% feel that they are prepared. Having a plan to basically just tell people to seek shelter when the missile are already in the air won’t win any best practices awards. Before we go on, the old civil defense system was not perfect by any means but at least there was a genuine effort by government to get people to understand the need to be prepared. The current plan does not take into account a number of limiting factors. One, FEMA’s planners assume that people have any inkling of how to “shelter” from radiation, let alone the blast effects. In the analog days we had AM radios with radio stations that were prepared to keep broadcasting emergency information in a post-nuclear attack world. Not sure how many millennials could even find an AM station.Continue reading“Modern Civil Defense – Part 2, by 3AD Scout”

