A Difference in Deference: The End of Chevron
Last week, Americans got some important and long-awaited news: Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies. Without a doubt, the 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council case was a very bad decision that had some far-reaching and lasting consequences. Under the Chevron doctrine, courts have often been required to defer to “…permissible” interpretations by federal agencies of the statutes that those agencies administer. Under Chevron, this deference extended to even when a court had a different reading of the relevant statute. It thus, in effect, allowed Federal agencies to create law, and ofttimes be beyond the …