Our weekly Snippets column is a collection of short items: responses to posted articles, practical self-sufficiency items, how-tos, lessons learned, tips and tricks, and news items — both from readers and from SurvivalBlog’s editors. Note that we may select some long e-mails for posting as separate letters.
—
The government of France is issuing a 20-page survival preparedness booklet to every citizen, by mail. JWR’s Comments: This “Votre kit d’urgence” advice is all very basic 72-hour kit stuff, including a recommendation to store flashlights and a whopping 6 liters of water, per person. The booklet’s publication was reportedly prompted by concerns over the war in Ukraine widening into a European regional war, with a risk of invasion. If the French government was serious about the risk of a Russian invasion, then they’d now be busy handing out their 1 million surplus MAS-36 bolt action rifles, 275,000 surplus MAS-49 semi-auto rifles, 350,000 surplus Modèle 1892 revolvers, and 100,000 surplus MAT-49 submachineguns — sans un bout de papier, naturellement. Those 1.7 million guns might equip some real maquisards. Somehow, I don’t think that just flashlights and bottled water are going to discourage a Russian invasion.
o o o
Canada’s Oldest Retailer, Hudson’s Bay, to Begin Liquidating Most Stores on Monday.
o o o
Reader D.S.V. suggested this piece on medical ethics at The Federalist: To Die Alone: Never Forget What The Lockdowners Did To Us.
o o o
“So, this is fascinating. Interarmco, later InterArms, was apparently created by the CIA. I presume for the twofold purpose of selling surplus weapons to generate income, and to occasionally dispose of items from insurgencies, etc, to eliminate trails.
Interarms did then, and do now, import lots of militaria.
Including the model Lee Harvey Oswald purchased through a local dealer.
It appears the answer might be, Yes.”
o o o
“The writer seems to be citing distances of effectiveness and using them on drones (50 yds). That info is changing. The vast majority of people do not/will not test their shotguns with different buckshot/chokes to determine their true maximum effective range. Combat shotgunning tests have shown severe wounding with 00 buckshot under good conditions to be around 100 yards on humans. That is impacting the target with at least one pellet at that range. Target covering (body armor, magazine-laden vests, helmets, etc) will make a difference on the effect. Drones are not armored.
There is no mention of shot type. That is very important beyond 30 yds. Hard copper plated seems to be the best for maintaining shape and ballistics longer. These rounds must also have a modern flite control wadding system to be used at long range. Federal LE types are usually the best. However, Winchester, Hornady, and even Remington have some good ones out. Shooters must do testing to find the best barrel/choke/buckshot combination to hit a typical drone size target at range. Too, most folks don’t realize the smaller the buckshot the less energy each pellet will have down range. I believe nothing smaller than number 1 buckshot should be used and on humans, nothing smaller than 00 if the range is greater than 30 yds. They simply lack the weight for adequate penetration.
No mention of muzzle velocity. There are many “low recoil” defense loadings out there now. These are a nod to the home defense types that are concerned about over-penetration. They can be made to pattern very well (holding a tight grouping longer) but have low initial velocity thereby limiting effective range. In the tactical situations he described and for combat use on humans you want the highest velocity that will effectively pattern at the longest ranges you will encounter. The national spotlight of anti-gunners rarely looks at shotguns (big, heavy, and heavy ammo). They figure that there is little to fear. That’s fine because that gives us the wide variety of ammo choices we have currently.
Shotguns do not need a 30″ barrel for the best velocity. An 18″ barrel (the shortest you can have without ATF concerns) is nearly ideal for portability versus velocity. Ammo manufacturers also load powders that burn efficiently in that length. That all makes field portability much easier without sacrificing effectiveness.
Chokes with flitecontrol type wadding are a two-edged sword. Too tight and you destroy the wadding. Use of no choke will sometimes be counter to long-range effectiveness. Rule of thumb: use the choke that delivers the best pattern at the longest range with the highest velocity. No full chokes. They sometimes pattern well at short/med distances but damage wadding of buckshot at range. Start with cylinder bore (no choke) and work through several different tightness settings until the pattern board shows you they are no longer effective. Again, time, some expense but once you know your shotgun you will be lethal at ranges most won’t believe possible.
Thee was no discussion of multiple shots, meaning either quick shots to increase the patterns of shot or multiple trained shooters shooting at once. This would again add hit probably to drones at or even beyond 100 yds. For civilian use, 300 plus feet is pretty high for a drone to be effective in daylight but that is more your interest to decide. Simply put: the more pellets you can send the higher your probability of hits will be and I doubt a drone could take more than 1 or two 00 buckshot hits and remain effective or even fly.
This is never a short or concise topic; can’t be if all things are considered, which they must be to truly understand capability.
Note: There are “Skynet drone defense rounds” available for $39 for a three-pack. They project a net at the target drone. I have not tested them.”
o o o
Reader “Sis” had this comment:
“Concerning the St. Funogas article on food storage: Has he considered vacuum packing food? The bags are rather sturdy but using canning jars [with a vacuum-packing jar lid attachment] would certainly work with many foods. Of course, larger items like grains wouldn’t work in jars. But jars are reusable and could be put to use when not holding canned food. I do think though that vacuum packing bags would work for insect infestations. Then place the bags in 5-gallon buckets, to keep the bigger varmints out.”
o o o
And in response to the same article, Richard T. wrote:
“That was a very thorough article by St. Funogas. I have been using Joie bags for a variety of purposes including the freezer and they are very durable and a good value despite their initial high cost.”
SaraSue’s latest Snippet:
Please Send Us Your Snippets!
Please send your snippet items for potential posting to JWR. or AVL. You can do so either via e-mail or via our Contact form.