The odds of survival for those attempting to defend themselves in a Mad Max kind of world, or less dangerous environment, are higher if we have a solid communications plan. The amount of time and effort applied to establishing easy-to-use, and redundant communications is a critical investment that could pay dividends in many ways. As always, I’d rather have too much of a critically essential, rather than not enough. And surprisingly, the cost could be less than that of an HF transceiver. I could do without an HF transceiver as those whom are closest in proximity will be far more important than those only a few miles away, let alone a hundred, or thousands of miles away.
First, consider that without communications, we’ve got nothing. Communications of various types are central to any security plan. In other words, all of our efforts to prepare could be meaningless if we are unable to coordinate a strong defense that enables us to keep what we have. It is better to have a stronger defense than needed, than a lack of it. When we are developing a commo plan, we are sculpting a future battlefield to our favor. It is not only an electronic battlefield. We should not strive for parity, but for an advantage over potential future attackers — such as roving gangs. If we examine the capabilities of Mexican drug cartels, and the potential warloads that may have serious military experience, we could be faced with a very capable ‘gang’.
An ability to thwart current high-tech SIGINT efforts could be the difference between success or failure. Fortunately, there is an affordable low-tech option. As the threat goes high tech, we could go low tech with good old-fashioned military surplus field telephones. Using those as a primary means of communication, with transceivers as a supplemental means, we would have a tiered and redundant system that attains a much higher level of COMSEC. And there are many other advantages as well.
Continue reading“Advanced Field Telephone Techniques – Part 1, by Tunnel Rabbit”