In recent years American courts have not bolstered private property rights.  It has been well-publicized how the courts have deferred to local governments and even to private land developers, in allowing Eminent Domain declarations to deprive even multi-generational land owners of their property, for “public use”. This has gone far beyond just widening highways. Some of these “takings” have been for boondoggles like building privately-owned sports stadiums and shopping malls. But much less well known are court cases at the state and Federal levels that have upheld the assumed right of law enforcement officers to enter and surveil private lands with impunity, under the Open Fields Doctrine.

Open Fields = No Privacy

The Open Fields Doctrine is a modern derivation of the English Common Law, dating back to the era of Divine Right Kings.  As early as 1217, the British monarchy established the offices of “The Keepers of The King’s Deer” — also known as Rangers or Game Wardens. As officers of the crown, game wardens were given carte blanche to trespass on private lands at any hour of the day, to spy on suspected poachers, to seize evidence, extract confessions, and to make arrests. The notorious Sheriff of Nottingham was one such Game Warden. In medieval times, wardens were little more than armed and armored thugs whose job was to punish any “knave” caught poaching the king’s deer. Some of them even assumed the power of summary execution.  (See: Nathaniel Boothe’s The Rights of His Majesty’s Forest Asserted.)

Some states have rejected Open Fields Doctrine and have greater Fourth Amendment protections for land owners, but most do not.  Federal magistrates — including those adjudicating Federal  Fish and Game law violations — use the Open Fields standard, even on lands that are posted “No Trespassing.”

What is Curtilage?

In the 20th and 21st Centuries, the courts have enshrined both the Plain View Doctrine and the Open Fields Doctrine, but have absurdly extended them to anywhere outside the immediate surroundings of a house and outbuildings. Legally, this vicinity is known as the curtilage of a house. To this day, in most states, any sworn law enforcement officers can traipse all over your acreage at any time, and even install surveillance cameras without a warrant, only with the exception of your home’s curtilage. And the courts have held that even the curtilage of your home can be briefly entered (but not searched) without a warrant, for purposes of an investigation, a consensual “knock and talk”, or a “welfare check” precipitated by a call. And some courts have ruled that drones can over-fly a property to surveil it, again without a warrant.

Oddly, the courts have never defined any standard dimensions of curtilage. It seems to vary from state to state and even from case to case. Within city limits, properties of up to a couple of acres could safely be assumed to all be within curtilage. But in rural areas, the law gets fuzzy. The amount of timber on your land plays into this, because that affects the line of sight and the extent of “plain view.” Posting a property with “No Trespassing” signs is insufficient, in the eyes of the law. The problem, in essence, is that a property line does not necessarily equal a curtilage boundary.

It is On You

As a land owner, the onus is on you to post your property in defense against any would-be property rights violators, namely: hunters, fishermen, hikers, and law enforcement officers. I suggest that in addition to “No Trespassing” signs around your land’s full perimeter you now must post Curtilage Boundary signs, to properly assert and exercise your rights, in particular as an overt warning to public officials.  In effect, when it comes to curtilage, we must name it and claim It.  If you don’t post your intent, then some crook with a badge could claim that the curtilage of your house does not extend much beyond your front porch.

Specifically, I suggest that after you walk your property lines and post “No Trespassing” signs, you also do a second personal survey, to determine where you might place Curtilage Boundary signs,  presumably at 100-foot intervals. (Consult your state laws, for details.) If your house and outbuildings are in direct line of sight from any portion of your property lines, then you can safely assume that that portion of your property line is also your curtilage boundary, and that it can and should be posted as such. For any part of your property that is not in direct line of sight of your house and outbuildings, then I suggest you post Curtilage Boundary signs at a 250-foot distance from the farthest structure corners.

You can have Curtilage Boundary signs made locally, by a printing shop. These days, printed Tyvek signs are the most economical choice. These have surprising longevity. Even longer-lasting custom aluminum signs are affordable. Here is the sign wording that I suggest:

Some Provisos

Keep in mind the following provisos:

• Posting laws, including sign sizes and intervals between signs vary from state to state.
• No warrant is required for a law enforcement search if permission is given, and some courts have held that any adult present could give permission to search — even a guest staying in your home, or your landlord! My general advice is to never grant permission to any search, always demand the opportunity to phone your attorney, and make NO statements without your attorney present.
• To end a “consensual encounter” with a law enforcement officer, you must verbally assert clearly: “I have nothing to say to you. You do not have my permission to search. I am ordering you to leave my property. You are now violating my home’s curtilage and you are trespassing.” Do so repeatedly, if need be. At that point, the best thing to do is lock your door and call your attorney.  If they linger, then also call your Sheriff’s Department.  (If they lack a warrant or exigent circumstances and they linger, public officials have no more legal rights than vagrant trespassers.)
• You are within your rights to insist that law enforcement officers end a consensual encounter and leave your property unless they have arrived to effect an arrest or a search under a written court order (a warrant), or seizure of contraband seen in plain view, or under exigent circumstances.  (The latter, for example, would be someone screaming or shouting “Help!”)
• A few jurisdictions allow “telephonic” warrants from a judge or magistrate, but those must eventually be backed up with a written warrant.
• Anything found by a law officer as part of an illegal search is not admissible as evidence in court, under the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine.
• Even a search warrant is not blanket permission to search all parts of a property. Only those places and items specifically named in the warrant can legally be searched.  Any searches going beyond the terms of the warrant would also fall under the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine.
• A recently enacted Federal law has made it a felony to shoot down drones, since they are classified as “aircraft.” (See: 18 U.S.C. § 32.)

Once again, I encourage my readers to post their property lines and also establish and post their Curtilage Boundaries. – JWR