Jim,
I have been riding BMW motorcycles for about 10 years. I have seen a few of those Urals around, and every one with first hand knowledge says they are not as dependable as the Beemers. But– the design is pretty simple, and they are not hard to work on. My Beemer has 86 K miles on it, and I had to replace a starter, and a coil. That’s it.
I guess the big question with the Ural is, does it have points ignition, or electronic?
This would be my first concern, now.
I have been entertaining the idea of putting a diesel engine on a Beemer. It would be fairly easy, as they have an automotive style dry clutch. It would be a bit slower, top-end, but it should still get up to 60 or 70 mph. I have seen a few done in my web-
surfing. Depending on the weight of the flywheels, it may accelerate just as well.
My Beemer has electronic ignition, but it is not computerized, so it might survive an EMP. How would I find out? – Sid, near Niagara Falls
Hello Mr. Rawles:
In regarding to your blog posting that someone recommended the Ural motorcycle which gets 31 mpg.
The Ural motorcycles are well known for being unreliable. They are also pricey. A $3,000 Honda Rebel 250cc will get you 70miles per gallon and as a Honda will give you less headaches. Shaft drive motorcycles – like the Ural, while needing less maintenance, are impossible to repair on the road. Its quite easy to change a motorcycle chain or master link and keep the chain lubricated.
While the Ural with the side car and two wheel drive capability offers great mobility, a 1980s diesel Mercedes automobile will get you 35+ mpg and you can find one with broken air conditioning for $1,500. A lot cheaper than the $8-10K they want for a Ural.
Keep up the great work and thanks! – L.B.