- SurvivalBlog.com - https://survivalblog.com -

Update: In-Town Versus Isolated Retreats

This feature article is an update to a SurvivalBlog article that I wrote back in August of 2005:

There are two distinct modes of fixed location survival retreats: ”In Town” and “Isolated.” The former depends on some local infrastructure while the latter is designed to be almost entirely self-sufficient and self-contained. Isolated retreats are also often termed “remote” retreats.

Not everyone is suited to tackling the tasks required for self-sufficiency at an isolated retreat. Advanced age — with the inevitable loss of muscle mass — physical handicaps, lack of trustworthy family or friends, or chronic health conditions could rule that out. If that is your situation, then you will probably want to establish an inconspicuous “in town” retreat rather than an isolated “stronghold” retreat. Generally, isolated retreats are more suitable for folks under age 60.

In-Town Retreats

If opting for “in town,” then buy a masonry house with a fireproof roof on an oversize lot. Make that wood frame construction if you live in earthquake country. Carefully select a town with a small population—somewhere between 1,000 and 3,000 if it has a true “end to end” gravity-fed water supply, or from 200 to 1,000 if the water system is in any way dependent on the power grid. (The 1,000 upper limit is for fear of sanitation problems.) In my opinion, towns and larger than 3,000 lack a cohesive sense of “our community”, and any town with a population smaller than 200 would lack a sufficient mix of skills and the manpower required to mount a sufficient defense in the event of a true “worst case.”

For more about the importance of having a sense of community, see my September 2008 article titled: Finding a Mineshaft or a Gemeinschaft [1].

I still believe that it is best to avoid larger towns. At some number over the 3,000 inhabitant threshold, the “we/they paradigm” will be lacking, and in a true TEOTWAWKI, it could be every man for himself.

The Mel Tappan Approach

The late Mel Tappan wisely opined that if your house is at the end of the dead-end of a road at the edge of town with no close-by neighbors, then it might just as well be five or ten miles out of town–since it will be psychologically outside of the invisible ring of protection that will constitute “in town.” Post-TEOTWAWKI, the “we/they” paradigm will be forcefully if not painfully obvious. If you are “in town” you will benefit from a de facto Neighborhood Watch on Steroids. Make sure that your retreat is either clearly “in town”, or not. A property that is halfway in between will have none of the advantages and all of the disadvantages.

Tappan championed the concept of small-town retreating: owning a mini-farm that is physically and psychologically inside of an existing small community.

Technology and Isolated retreats

Several technology trends and societal trends in recent years have made isolated retreats much more realistic for a wider cross-section of survivalists and preppers. A lot has changed since 2005. For example:

The Pros and Cons

Before making your decision, please consider the following pro and con lists:

Advantages of “In Town” Retreats:

Disadvantages of “In Town” Retreats:

Advantages of Isolated Retreats:

Disadvantages of Isolated Retreats:

A careful analysis of the preceding lists (plus any specific localized considerations) should lead you to conclude which approach is right for you, given your family situation, your stage in life, and your own view of the potential severity of events to come.

Be sure to study this well and pray about it before making a decision of this gravity. – JWR