- SurvivalBlog.com - https://survivalblog.com -

The Editors’ Quote of the Day:

“Between the Restoration and the Glorious Revolution, the Stuart Kings Charles II and James II succeeded in using select militias loyal to them to suppress political dissidents, in part by disarming their opponents. Under the auspices of the 1671 Game Act, for example, the Catholic James II had ordered general disarmaments of regions home to his Protestant enemies. These experiences caused Englishmen to be extremely wary of concentrated military forces run by the state and to be jealous of their arms. They accordingly obtained an assurance from William and Mary, in the Declaration of Right (which was codified as the English Bill of Rights), that Protestants would never be disarmed: “That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.” This right has long been understood to be the predecessor to our Second Amendment. It was clearly an individual right, having nothing whatever to do with service in a militia. To be sure, it was an individual right not available to the whole population, given that it was restricted to Protestants, and like all written English rights it was held only against the Crown, not Parliament. But it was secured to them as individuals, according to “libertarian political principles,” not as members of a fighting force.”” – Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Scalia’s Court: A Legacy of Landmark Opinions and Dissents [1]

 

Comments Disabled (Open | Close)

Comments Disabled To "The Editors’ Quote of the Day:"

#1 Comment By ThoDan On October 7, 2020 @ 9:59 am

wasn´t that “right” restricted by wealth?

#2 Comment By wally On October 9, 2020 @ 6:20 am

only under the idea that you could have arms if you could afford them….